Or there is always the other possibility. China's current economic growth model encourages a wide gap between the "rich" (legal city dwellers) and the "poor" (peasants). With the way that China is prioritizing urban growth as a conduit for economic growth (see Shanghai) over rural development projects (see millions forced to move for the three gorges dam project) there is little possibility of another outcome. If China can move just 20-30 percent of it's population to near EU per capita income (which BTW is 32nd in the world), well....that would put them easily on a level playing field with the EU and/or the US. One China two systems seems to be the idea. Basically, define regions of relative freedom for that 20-30 percent, corden them off from the peasantry and build a superpower. Despite Mao's rhetoric, the peasant class were screwed by the Emperors, then the Commies and soon to be screwed royally under this new Capitolist communism theory. As a result they have really two choices with what they can do with the peasantry. a) cut them off and let 'em figure it out themselves (DANGEROUS!)

continue their policy of using them as cannon fodder in regional conflicts i.e. "Project Taiwan Reclamation". It's obvious that the Chinese central committee has really no desire to continue implimenting socialism as a class eraser. It's bad for business and is no way to run a country.