Can you please write more about your reasons for such a subtitle?
Thank you.

Nobody said you supported the KKK. And change the subtitle again. You are currently demanding that the two be dealt with in the same building.



For what reason? You didn't give any examples, instead asked others for links. If you want to know how bad Scientology is, that makes sense. But if you think you already know, you should give us the links, not ask us for them.

Come on! Didn't that already show when he wrote the original article, before he changed anything?

I don't think he knows what a "manor" is, as he still demands that Scientology and the KKK be dealt with in the same such in his article.

I do think he is a a confrontation coward: if somebody questions his idiotic rants, he will attack them, out of the safety of his anonymity. He probably thinks that we read what he writes and respect him for his insights into Scientology and his bravery in openly voicing his disagreements with them.

Problem is, his incoherent ramblings do not quite allow us actually to understand what exactly his opinion about Scientology and what his point is. Maybe he has heard somewhere that Scientolofy is bad. I don't think he understands why or what they do.



I am more worried about people thinking that Scientology's "critics" are uneducated and moronic nutters.



Of course you do. And he obviously doesn't.

But he also doesn't know much else.

Do you think that maybe he is a Klansman or Scientologist pretending that their critics are idiots?

Why thank you little whip, that means a lot coming from you. Your maturity just shines thru when I read some of your titles/subtitles. Again thank you, your comment brings a tear to my eye.

As far as the rest of it...yeah I know, but it was one of the more damaging things ever done to the KKK.


I would have to disagree with the above two comments. Maybe read the response to the next quote, if you still can't figure it out, might I suggest you get an education?


No, I was suggesting that maybe tactics that scientology uses, be turned against them.

LW,

I changed the subtitle again, I was not aware of the rule, hope this satisfies your sense of respect for other JUs. We all know that the rules where written to show respect for each other, and they should be followed to the T, if not the intent.

I am surew that you follow all the rules to the T (if not the intent), your level of respect of other JUs often shines thru.

Is LW OK (above), or can I use your full user name, wasn't sure about the rules, so I just used LW.

As a side note, I find it amazing how paranoid people are on this forum.

I do too, but I find it odd that you would be under that impression, given that you feel under attack by LW and me.



Well, he did manage to confuse three people and is now angry at two of them. He totally failed to start a discussion about Scientology and attacked at least one of his few readers. And the case he wanted to make is still not clear.

He certainly doesn't know much about either Scientology or the KKK, or he could have written something more coherent than eight lines of rubbish. Or he could have focused on the subject in his replies rather than the intellectual inferiority of everyone who cared to reply to his nonsensical article.