| there's a BIG difference between running a stop sign in a 2-ton piece of machinery vs. a 30lb. bicycle. If I run a stop sign and hit a car who is going to be hurt.....me. If a car runs a stop sign and hits a bicyclist who is going to be hurt....the bicyclist. So there really is a difference in the amount of harm possible for each law-infraction. |
Come on ... you really think you should be given a break because, although you broke the law, you drive a vehicle that is not capable of as much damage as other modes of transportation?
Aside from the fact that it is not the traffic cop's job to judge the severity of the infraction, nor the punishment, potential damage caused is not usually the prime consideration in policing traffic. Most of those type infractions are black and white; you either stop or you don't stop, you exceeded the speed limit or you didn't.
Granted, traffic cops do have leniency in deciding whether to issue a citation or a warning, but to claim you deserve a warning because of your mode of transportation is a bit off base, if not a tad elitist.
This may come across as a bit harsh but you seem to be of a mind that portrays bicyclists as not governed by the same rules of the road as everyone else.
Or more to the point, you don't feel bicyclists should be governed by the same rules of the road as everyone else.