Excellent post on a much overlooked topic.
How the Arab press is pressuring countries NOT to act in the Sudan: http://www.sudantribune.com/article.php3?id_article=8352
From BBC News, July 8th, 2004 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3875277.stm)): "France opposes UN Sudan sanctions, France says it does not support US plans for international sanctions on Sudan if violence continues in Darfur."
France is debating over whether to permit war crimes trials for the actions and inactions of French military forces in Rwanda during THAT genocide, it should be noted.
From the Christian Science Monitor earlier today (http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0304/p08s01-comv.html)comparing the UN actions in the Congo to their inaction in the Sudan: "Strangely, the Council isn't nearly so bold in Africa's other giant country, Sudan, where millions have been displaced and tens of thousands killed since 2003 in the province of Darfur."
A sticking point is "whether the US should approve a proposal to let the International Criminal Court try some of Darfur's aggressors for "crimes against humanity." Meanwhile, only about 1,800 lightly armed troops from African nations are in Darfur, where they are obliged just to monitor a much-violated cease-fire."
The United Nations has put a condition on stopping the killings in the Sudan: the US must agree to accept the authority of the ICC. The US is loath to do so, for fears that US civilians will be tried before it. Currently, UN peace keepers accused of crimes are tried in their country of origin. See the Fraance comment above.
So, people die and women are raped, while the country is used as a political football.
By the way, I agree with you about the need to blog this. See http://kupe.joeuser.com/index.asp?aid=21828