I've been thinking about Obama's recent Asian trip but first let me back track on something that adds to the puzzle I want to share.
President Obama goes to Copenhagen in what was advertised as campaigning for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Chicago. After listening to his and Michelle's speeches I felt very troubled. I felt like there was nothing heartily candid about why Chicago should host the 2016 Olympics. After a bit more research I found this interesting tidbit.
The UN came out with a Climate Treaty just a few weeks before this trip. LINK
Now I'm not trying to invoke conspiracy here but please let me continue. Obama shortly after his trip to Copenhagen then receives the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 on Oct. 9. During Obama's 'acceptance speech' he said:
Moments later, the president highlighted his early efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons and halt the threat of global warming -- work cited by the Nobel Prize committee that is a long way from completion.
"These challenges can't be met by any one leader or any one nation," Obama said. "And that's why my administration has worked to establish a new era of engagement in which all nations must take responsibility for the world we seek."
Turning to global warming, Obama added, "We cannot accept the growing threat posed by climate change, which could forever damage the world that we pass on to our children -- sowing conflict and famine, destroying coastlines and emptying cities. And that's why all nations must now accept their share of responsibility for transforming the way that we use energy."
Why is this relevant?
For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."
Now they have a political figure that can use Presidential resources to promote the UN Climate Change Treaty (to replace the Kyoto Protocol which expires 2012).
So this all happened in October. Now while the economy is in shambles, unemployment on the rise, spending gone amok, Obama decides to tour the Asian nations. No real purpose is mentioned other than to improve diplomacy and world image.
Later we find out that it was all about Climate control ESPECIALLY behind closed doors. LINK
It seems to me that the pieces are coming together pointing to Obama as the political mouthpiece for the new UN Climate Treaty AKA Copenhagen Treaty. Why do I say this?
Well, isn't it interesting that the first part of December is when the nations will meet in Copenhagen to vote on this Treaty? LINK
On October 14, 2009, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN. The following link is the final 4 minutes of his speech. LINK
This could begin to cede the US Sovereignty to the UN?
To top this all off Al Gore, is excited about Obama going to Copenhagen in December. LINK
Is this really happening or is this all happenstance?