That's one way of putting it.

Of course, given the extreme hostility of many Arabs towards any minority and especially Jews; given that non-Arab minorities in Arab countries have been persecuted, discriminated against, and gassed in the last century; and given that most Arab countries have murdered and expelled their original Jewish minority populations any solution that would hand over the remaining middle-eastern Jews to those same Arab nationalists might indeed find little support among the Jewish elite.

The leader of the Arabs in "Palestine" (or southern Syria, as he saw it), Muhammed al-Husayni said in 1944, in Berlin:

After both wars he wrote in his memoirs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni

So, yes, I agree with you. The reason there is a conflict in Israel between Jews and Arabs, actually in the entire Arab world between Arabs and all minorities but specifically Arabs and Jews, is the refusal of the Ashkenazi Jewish elite to support the obvious solution.

I am fully confident that if the Jewish elite had supported the obvious solution, the conflict would be over by now, and "Palestine" would be as Jew-free as the rest of the Arab world (sans Morocco). And there would be no conflict and we would have perfect peace in "Palestine" (except for the odd major war between Islamic fundamentalists and Arab nationalists and the like).

Note that al-Husayni is still revered by the PLO. Yasser Arafat (al-Husayni's nephew) called him his mentor and the father of the "Palestinian" people.

So how do we convince Israel's current elite (which includes Jews that fled Arab countries) to support the "obvious solution"?

After 6 million died in the Holocaust perpetrated by the Arabs' German friends and several Arab attempts to destroy Israel and kill all the Jews and millions of Jews expelled from all Arab countries (except Morocco), an "obvious solution" that depends entirely on the good-will of those same people seems a bit problematic to me.

I can tell you that I won't support the "obvious solution"; although when Hassan Nasrallah called on all the Jews in the world to assemble in northern Israel so he could kill them all, I did go to northern Israel and had I not been evacuated, the "obvious solution" would have allowed me to find peace.

 

 

 

History didn't clash with personal biography. My experience was EXACTLY what Arab leaders had announced in the 1930s and 1940s.




Your "fresh thinking" has already been thought of. But after numerous attacks and threats against the Jewish population of "Palestine", the League of Nations and later the UN luckily decided against it.

Your idea is not new, it has merely been shown not to work.



The difference is that some scars are caused by Arab and German attempts to eradicate the Jews while other scars are caused by Jewish refusal to die.

Your attempt to make these sound morally equivalent are part of the problem.

What we need is for the Arabs to face their history and come to the conclusion that it was WRONG to try to exterminate middle-eastern Jews, not for Jews to apologise for something they never did and never tried to do.

What you are proposing as a "fresh idea" is simply a Holocaust. And I thought the world was sick of it.

How can you propose that two peoples live together when one of them still wants to destroy the other???

Interesting comments. I wish I had more to add, but I think Leauki has stated the important parts.

It is not Jews per se. It is rational people. You cannot reason with irrational people, so they always put the onus on the rational ones "Why dont you....".

They do it to the US and other peace loving nations because they are peace loving, and eventually some gullible sap is going to take up the mantra.

Palestinian Arabs have found such a way. Israeli Arabs do live in peace with Israeli Jews. Arab clans in Hevron have come to an arrangement with the settlers (since both sides hated the PLO). Arabs in Gaza have been interviewed and some (older men) have said they wanted the occupation back rather than live under Hamas.

The problem is people like Bahu and others who want to interfere and turn the clock back and restart the war Israel won.

They really do believe that a world without Zionism means peace. And they are right. But such a world is also a world without Jews in the middle east just as a world where nobody opposed Hitler is a world without Jews in Europe. There would be peace, but there would also be millions dead.

You can always have peace if you give the violent people what they want; EVERYTHING they want. The violent people want peace. They just don't want it before the others are dead.

Have you even read the quotes I gave you???




Simple: because they a) supported the Germans and tried to do what the Germans did.

I don't see why Arabs are morally better than Germans just because they were unable to implement what they learned from the Germans!

The Holocaust was in Europe, but the Palestinian Arab's attempt to do the same in "Palestine" happened in the middle east, as did Arab persecution of Jews and other minorities in Arab countries.

"Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world." -- Muhammed al-Husayni, "Arafat's" uncle and mentor, to this day seen as a popular hero by Palestinian Arabs

If you want to look for a difference between Germans and Arabs, don't look at their relative ineptness, look at how much they have changed since then. Germans DO NOT want to kill Jews any more and DO NOT revere their former leaders as heroes. Did the PLO ever say that al-Husayni's cooperation with the Nazis was anything but a patriotic and heroic act?

You certainly won't find a German government official telling you that some SS leader is the "father of the nation" or a "mentor". And the newphew of an SS leader would not be made president, at least not if he openly revered his uncle.

Your racist remark about Jews being a "cross to bear" shows where you are coming from.

Incidentally, the Germans are "bearing" that "cross". Jews do live in Germany today. They immigrated from Russia and the west. Some survived. None of them have to live as second-class citizens or are persecuted by the state. And they are not perceived as a "cross to bear" either.

You can learn a lot from the Germans, Bahu, a whole lot.

You are still at the "Jews are a cross to bear" stage where murdering Jews seems like an acceptable solution to you. The Germans have left that stage behind. Maybe some day so will you.

And the next time you pretend that Palestinian Arabs had nothing to do with the Holocaust, remember al-Husayni's words and his alliance with the Nazis, and remember that a "Holocaust" is not just something that happens, but also something that can be stopped.

And by G-d, Israel will continue to stop it.

In Jan 2007 i posted a proposal along the same line of thinking an dlisted the basis for it .... the logic behind it and its benefits for all .... here is the link if anyone is interested ....

http://thinkaloud.joeuser.com/article/142414/Proposal_for_the_Holy_Land

as you can see from the comments there .... logic and real honest-to-God desire for peace is not there yet ... may be it will exist sometime in the future

ThinkAloud,

Before I read your old article, can you just tell me: does it take into account the fact that a) the Jews don't want to be killed and that the Arabs do want to kill the Jews (unless they were lying in the last and just pretended to try to destroy Israel)?

Because if it is another of those "let the Arabs deal with the Jews" plans, I'm afraid I will be against it.

What about a peace plan in which the Arabs reject al-Husayni's vision and the PLO, as well as Hamas and Hizbullah, denounce their Nazi ties, and just stop trying to kill the Jews?

Did you even read the quote from the "Palestinian" leader I gave you above?

So what does it mean when the Arabs try to "throw the Jews into the sea"? Or when PLO leaders before the six-day war announce that they don't believe that there will be any survivors after the attack? Or when "Palestinian" television announces that Jews are pigs and apes that must be killed?

If this is "original" to you, then perhaps you ought to do more research before you try to solve a conflict you don't understand.

The "grand mufti" of Jerusalem, Arafat's uncle and mentor, was not in Bosnia to recruit Muslims for the SS because the weather in the region is so excellent.



That "ethnic cleansing" was, presumably, when Arab leaders told the Arabs in Palestine to leave and Jews begged them to stay and defend the country?

You are a liar, Bahu.

Blame the Jews, if you like, but don't pretend that you can contribute anything to a peace plan.

You might be surprised to learn that even most Palestinian Arabs, inside and outside Israel, do not have as anti-Semitic views as you do, at least not when they have met Jews or Israelis.



Yes, you implied that the Jews are a cross to bear. That's what offended me.

But Arab nationalists (like German nationalists) think the same thought. That's what al-Husayni meant when he said the famous words (that you, for some reason, never address):

"Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you."

That was in 1944, so don't tell me that "ethnic cleansing" (or rather "begging them to stay") caused al-Husayni and his ilk to conspire with the Nazis.

Bahu, I dare you to write another article using al-Husayni's statement ("Kill the Jews whereever you find them.") as the title. If you don't think that the "Palestinian" leader calling for a Holocaust in 1944 in Berlin constitutes a "Palestinian" attempt to kill Jews, especially when a few years later there follows a full-scale Arab attack on the Jews, there is no reason not to quote him on that!

No, but Amadenijad has. As well as Saddam (He is arab, right????), Assad, and many, many more. Try listening to what the leaders (albeit tyrants and despots) of the Arabs say, and not what the anti-semites say they say.

There are two different sequences at work in what Leuki writes: First, there have been irresponsible statments from Arab leaders and the President of Iran's statement needs to be condemned. Having said that we must remember that all the rhetoric from the Arabs have been reactive. They are reacting to the loss of land, history and memory and there is now a possiblity of a solution in thje form of a Israeli-Palestinian state.

There is an academic journal called Genocide and Holocaust studies and is a serious research journal on the subject. It has addressed the issue of Arab-Israeli violence, but that violence is not to be confused as being of genocidal purpose. I feel that such charge as the moral equvalence between the Israeli-Palestenian conflict and the German sponsored Genocide that Leuki is advocating is a kind of revisionism and the unique nature of the Holocaust is undermined if such comparisons are made for rhetorical purposes.

Now if you ask me about Arafar or the PLO or for that matter the HAMAS I will say that I do not agree with their methods of targetting civillians and their strategy will only be counter-productive.

Actually, the revisionism is your denial of Arab attempts to exterminate Jews.

Arab leaders called for the extermination of the Jews, and given that they also attacked Israel regularly, I happen to believe them.

Why is that revisionism?

_I_ don't care if the person calling for my death is German or Arab. Why do you?

"Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: 'The Jews are yours'."

-- Muhammed al-Husayni (not a German but revered today still in "Palestine")

Dr Guy, I bet you five dollars (to be handed over if/when we ever meet) that Bahu will never ever address al-Husayni's statement!

I do understand how this works. Even a picture of the "Palestinian" leader with Hitler in 1944 won't convince him that the Arabs were anything but "reacting" to the fact that Jews are a cross to bear.

That's the view I tried to satirise here:

http://www.netneurotic.net/Extrablatt/

So what have we learned?

1. When an Arab leader calls for the extermination of the Jews in 1944 it is purely a reaction to Jews stealing land.

2. Jews are a cross to bear.

3. A German SS commander is evil, an Arab SS commander is not.

Anything else?