Option 1: Our award-winning real-time strategy game is the worst game released in 2016.
Option 2: The person who has me blocked on Twitter and gave our last game a 4 may have some objectivity issues…
I'm sure that "worse ever" were his words.
Who'd pay attention to a twit who doesn't know it should be worst ever.....lol......
I know, grammer Nazi. Doc is coming.....
Twits don't know nuthin'. Pay no attention to him. Ya don't get award winning for being the worst.
Does this mean we are allowed to complain about our ratings again? (JK)
I noticed that two people listed in the OP post gave the game a 5. Any issues with them?
I thought 'critics' were supposed to have thick skins and all that. I can't believe this guy even posts his name and pic...heaven forbid, someone might recognize him and jump him from behind at a urinal somewhere and do things to him with the metallic swivel lid from the trash can or stuff his head in a toilet and make his swirley go in the other direction.
Is this guy a legitimate game critic? Seriously. Cause I'd be damned if I would beg or apply to read one of his reviews. If he can't say it in public, it can't be worth reading and I wouldn't trust it.
Looks like he named himself accurately. To bad his review didn't follow suit.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account