But good to see you are still a liar, since here are your links from where you made the allegation:
And which when you blow up your "poof", you can see the links you try to lie with are not the same, in fact one is not even the same site! LIAR. Again, why am I not surprised?
well there ya have it sportsfans.
after all these years and, according to drguy, layers upon layers of deliberate prevarication, non-truths, mis-truths and falsehoods, i've been caught typing red-handed by none other than the net's most brilliant, dedicated and persistent anti-lie crusader and must now admit the following:
1. in my reply #79, i'd inserted a graphic image purporting to be a screencap of a google page on which i'd claimed to have found two specific links i'd pasted into my reply #69.
2. said links do point to two separate remote domains as intended neither of which was identified by name.
3. i modified said google page image, using a highlighted arrow to indicate where each of these two links was located and could be found on the page in question; i also added a third highlighted arrow to indicate the google page number (1).
4. in fact, one of those links indicated on the google page image was not the link i originally posted in my reply #69.
i sincerely apologize for having so egregiously misinformed the public.
having confessed and apologized, i feel obliged to expose one more lie conveniently overlooked by ol dr"honesttogod"guy:
1. referring to his reply#72 he states the links i provided in my reply #69 were located thusly:
Hmm, the 101st or 1001st hits from goolge?
2. in his reply#85 (partially quoted at the top of this post)--he affirmatively repeats his original claim the links i provided were "101st or 1001st" links.
3. both allegations were factually false from the jump; repeating them evidences premeditation compounded by malicious intent
although i didn't attempt to mitigate my own offense, i had no intention to deceive anyone and would not have deliberately weakened my argument had i realized i was pointing a different link than i'd previously posted. i was in a hurry and perhaps a bit careless. once again, i apologize.
i truly wish i could tell yall my accuser is merely a pompous self-serving asshole but since we're being totally candid and absolutely honest with each other i feel honor-bound to qualify that characterization a bit more accurately in that he's a lying pompous, self-serving asshole and an unapologetic habitual hypocrite who was proven a flagrantly unrepentant plagiarist by none other than little_whip