Falls into the same category.. but not exactly the same. There is a general question connected to this, namely how far nationstates have the obligation to protect their citicens from danger/harm that originates from an international organisation (like the CERN) and of which they are a member of. But the court avoided broaching that hot potatoe.
Principally, that woman does raise the legitimate general concern about unintended (harmful) consequences connected to technological progress. But the lawsuit just makes her look like a cray person.