but yet you implied he was trolling, which, so far as I remember from the like 4-5 years ive been around here, has a negative connotation around here.
Did I? First, I asked him a question, which he could have answered (but I think he knows what trolling consists of). Second, what would you call two word sentences (minus corrections for spelling) that add little or nothing to the topic? Must I post a link for you?
So, as such, you're attacking him by associating him with something that is negative.
That's reaching pretty far, wouldn't you say? By your definition Bush was viciously attacked every day in office and still is by people such as yourself. I posted (which had nothing to do with Infidel BTW) and he just couldn't let it go, yet I'm attacking him??? AJ remember back a few months I suggested you try the military? Well, I was wrong, you don't appear to know what an attack really is. There was no malice in my remark, for all I know there was none in Infidel's toward me. He took the opportunity to zing me and got zinged back. Nobody called for the Liberal Avenger to keep the peace, thank you very much.
Now two things could have happened, before you intervened: It could have ended and the folks debating the topic get back to it, or Infidel could have responded and I could have responded back or as bored as I am with this, let it go. So now ask yourself if you really helped matters? All this really does is give other readers a bad impression of us all and since you're super sensitive of what other think about you (remember a negative association is an attack in the AJ dictionary), as opposed to me, who gets hurt the most? If the truth is too painful, submit a complaint about me to Stardock.
I don't know much, if anything, about him.
Did I imply you know each other? Someone sympathetic to your ideas can be considered friendly. I.E. there are many friends of Obama that have never personally met him.
Whatever happened to CIVIL debate?
It's alive and well here on JU. Go over to DU and check it out if you really want to see uncivilized debate.
But at any rate is this an example of what you were talking about when you mention CIVIL?
You're the one that started it by being an utter douche, an asshole. It's not my fault you seem to have a fetish with trashing me. Now if you're willing to act like a big boy, and fucking respect me, then yes, I am willing to continue with the discussion. If not, then frankly, go beat around another bush. I'll just black list you from my blog and you can do the same for me on yours, since we'll have no reason to discuss anything.