WTF kind of bullshit is that? he pointed out that you obviously didn't read the article and instead jumped to conclusions from the title, you should thank him and slink away, and retract your silly statements, not tell him to not post on "your articles"...
You are lost and confused. That comment was in relation to him pointing out my typo as a way to insult me directly for disagreeing with his opinion. It had nothing to do with his disagreement. I wrote articles in the hopes to debate peoples opinions of any topic I post. To start name calling, insulting and doing silly things such as pointing to typo's (and not necessarily uneducatedly misspelled words) right off the back as oppose to providing a counter argument to the counter argument is childish to me and something i will point out and ask nicely to keep it to themselves, unless otherwise provocked and forced to use stronger words.
I'm not here to make enemies, I'm here to debate, to learn and to understand other people.
You said toy, it was a replica without the plastic cap to indicate its a replica,
Toy or not the child did not shoot the gun and make any kinds of threats (that I read or heard of) besides pointing the gun. I don't believe that pointing a gun is an reason to shoot someone. Our society should be better than that, cops are there to protect and serve not shoot first ask questions later. I have seen countless situations where cops had plenty of reasons to shoot and didn't, situation where guns where never even drawn and situations where they did not shoot first. This was wrong, period.
ou said "no mention of age" when the artile starts with the age of the "kid" (15)...
And I admitted my mistake on the 4th post. Hey, I am only human. I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong. I did not insult him on that. like I said to him I say to you. chill out dude.
If a 15 year was told by a cop to drop their weapon, they shouldn't point it the cop
Agreed, but that was not a reason to shoot him. Plain and simple. This could have been handled better. This was not a call about someone goinga round shooting people, making threats and being violent. The child was riding his bike on the streets, how the hell does that make him a threat?
actually the cops showed a lot of restraint, they shot him ONCE in a non essential part and he will make a full recovery, cops are trained to empty their magazine into an assailant to make sure he is dead (a person with just 1 or 2 bullets in him can still shoot you back).
Restraint? They shot him was little cause. How is that restraint. Restarint is when a cop does not shoot unless absolutely necessary and even then they hesitate. Restraint is when not matter how much you want to do something, you don't. I'll use your own comment against you. Why did the cop only shoot him once? Did he really believe the kid was a threat?