It's _Creationism_, not _Christianity_ that holds science back.
Want examples for that? Look at any majority Muslim country that doesn't teach evolution and instead relies on "Islamic science" (which happens to teach EXACTLY the same, word for word, as the Bible about creation, and, like you, they also take it literally).
Where is your RESEARCH? You're TOTALLY ignoring what I'm showing and asking you to do. I told you and showed you with a premiere Scientific Journal (not even Christian) that it's about the money. The Muslim countries ARE NOT giving the money to scientific programs. That's it. It has nothing to do with Christianity or Creationism. It's about money.
Hmmmm....saying "three Gods" is a confusing way of explaining
There are three Persons in one God....One God revealed in three ways.
yes this is true Lula. What I'm saying tho...is Jesus is God. The Holy Spirit is God. Jehovah of the OT is God. They are all God which make up the one triune God.
Good luck to him finding new breakthroughs in neuro science without using embryonic stem cells.
We don't need embryonic (destroying life) cells when we can very well use adult stem cells (without destroying life) which have a better track record. But let me see if I can get a quote from him on this and get back to you.
And if your son happens to mention in his research that there is no explanation for something he found except that "G-d made it", we'll see whether he will get his Ph.D..
that's not how the program works. He's already got a 4.0 in the schooling part of it. All he has to do is finish his research and to publish it.
All of his senior Ph.D's who are surrounding him think he's brilliant and guess what? They have NO idea he's a Christian. They've tested him orally and by regular exams, they've watched him, they've had discussions at length with him and yet he's a Christian. One of them even told him (not knowing) that those Christian Scientists are idiots.
So who really is the idiot?
Actually, no. I rely mainly on Maimonides, a 12th century scholar mainly followed by non-Haredi orthodox Jews.
I quoted Maimonides in our discussion about angels, remember?
exactly. You just proved my point. He's going against the traditional teaching of Judiasm which is what I thought. I would implore you to be balanced (at least) to check out the traditional views of the Hebrew community as well.
He was the maker of the world, but he was not more than one. (Which is, incidentally, the Bible keeps repeating that he is one.)
Well you said that Elohim was plural right? THAT IS FACT.
Now you say "he was the maker of the world but he wss not more than one."
THAT IS NOT FACT BUT OPINION. You have to use the bible as a whole to interpret correctly. Even if you just use the OT as a whole. You can't take out one verse, give me the meaning and then give me your opinion as fact on the meaning.
We don't. You see it in your scripture. The Hebrew text says nothing of the sort. And we are looking for hints in the Hebrew text, I thought.
Could be different perspectives. Could be that the "New Testamant" has been made up by clever Romans. Could be lots of things.
The one thing it can't be is a Trinity.
Well, I can show you the trinity with JUST the OT scriptues. I can show you CHRIST in the OT scriptures. As far as the clever Romans? Well the NT was written by Jews, not Romans and this is FACT supported by Jewish historians OUTSIDE of scripture.
I am sure you know that that is 6:4.
yes, typo. Sorry
"YHVH": actual name of G-d, pronounced "adonai" in Rabbinic Judaism, correct pronunciation is NOT "jehova"
now, you keep saying this. All Jehovah is is English version of YHWH. The Lord literally YHWH probably pronouced Yahweh is the most significant name for God in the OT. It's actually mentioned 6,823 times and is usually associated with the holiness of God.
Actually, that's a picture of what a duo is.
yes, but the point is, the word one in Genesis is two as one. Elohim is three in one or as one.