Gee, another rightwinger arguing that your own inability to comprehend the facts prevents the facts existence. How do you suggest I prove it to someone who has argued that they refuse to believe it regardless of the information provided?
One, I'm not a rightwinger. While I lean conservative, I have my own mind to use, thank you very flipping much.
Two, I have never (read NEVER, spelled N-E-V-E-R) stated that I refuse to believe it. I asked you for a legitimate source and told you FLAT OUT that I would do everything I could to keep the story alive IF you provided your hairball assertions. But apparently not only am I in on the vast rightwing conspiracy to bury the story, but so is every major search engine on the Internet, because THEY'RE not providing me with credible support, either. In other words, you're a bald faced liar who believes that ad hominem attacks amount to "proof".
Three, I have no difficulties with reading comprehension. If you have provided this proof, I have never seen it, nor, apparently, has anyone else.
I actually had hopes for having some good discussions with you, but apparently your intellectual ability is limited to personal attacks and name calling. Pity, because if your political position was actually borne out of SUBSTANCE, I think I would have enjoyed the banter.