The fact that it's being challenged by our own federal government is evidence enough of that.

Well you actually read the bill, unlike the President and other officials in the government.  There is nothing that promotes racial profiling.  As usual, the President uses the race card to defer from the real problem going on around the border.

The problems I have with this law..

Immigration is under federal jurisdiction not state jurisdiction...states cannot deport anyone...put an ICE hold on any undocumented committing violent crime and let the federal government handle it.

It puts an unfair burden on law enforcement.  This bill allows local departments to be sued for not enforcing immigrations laws.  Law enforcement can also forget about any cooperation from undocumented people who are victims of or witnesses to crime.

The undocumented are here for jobs.  Go after the business owners that hire them.  Why can't we do that?  Well because those business owners contribute to political campaigns, that's why. 

I wish someone could explain to me exactly how this works without profiling.  I guess the officers need to ask every person they deal with for their documentation in order to not profile. 

We need comprehensive immigration reform in this country that will allow these workers to earn legal status which is next to impossible now. 

The feds are not enforcing the law so Arizona has do it for them. It's called self preservation. Do you think they are going though all this trouble because they are a bunch of racist having fun? They are desperate.

It won't be an easy time but it's got to be done. Law enforcement may have to work harder but that's the way it is when things get out of hand.

sections 5,6,7

Every time I ever got pulled over(and that's been plenty)I've had to prove who I was. Everyone must carry some form of ID, it's always been that way.

We need to control the boarder first. The workers illegals need to go home.

I think it is becoming the other way around.

Um....what?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/21/kyl-obama-wont-secure-border-lawmakers-immigration-package/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/16/closes-park-land-mexico-border-americans/

Loca,

I am curious. Are you against the Arizona Law or the federal Immigration law in general? I ask because as many have said the Arizona law simply enforces an existing law, a law that, by your opinion can discriminate based on race. The problem here is, this whole discrimination issue was never an issue because the law was never enforced by the Gov't which ended up creating the illegal immigration in the first place which now brings us to Arizona having to do what the Federal Gov't has not done and now refuses to do. Now discrimination is an issue because we will actually be enforcing an "existing" law. It's like saying fire is only dangerous if you actually get burned, the immigration laws only discriminate when enforced. But then why do we have it?

So you see, I am still confused by some peoples dislike for a State law that simple enforces a Federal law but why is no one criticizing the Federal law? You either are in favor of stopping illegal immigration or you are not but I just can see how there is an in between on this issue. You can't be against illegal immigration but be in favor of rewarding those who are already here by making them citizens or not punishing them just because they are already here because then what is the purpose of having an immigration law in the first place.

A lot of people talk about reform. But what exactly do you mean when you say we need immigration reform? Does that mean make it easier for non-citizens to become citizens? Does it mean we should have open boarders? Does it mean we should only make it a crime if the illegal immigrant commits a crime? What exactly do people want reformed?

I want there to a be a way for undocumented workers who are already here to earn legal status in this country.  I think they should have to register, pay a fine for entering the country illegally, and be able to earn citizenship.  Our current laws make it almost impossible for anyone to come to the country legally unless they have education and skills or a relative who is a citizen.  I think we need to greatly increase the number of temporary work visas available.  I do not support an open border.  Right now it is a civil offense to be in the country without documentation.  It is a criminal offense to enter the country illegally.  I also support the Dream act which allows non-citizen chidren of undocumented workers to earn citizenship through military service or graduating from college. 

This is Alice-in-Wonderland thinking.  Though 'thinking' may be a generous description.

Try squatting your ass down in any other country illegally & see how that works out for you, especially Mexico.

People who want to come here permanently should come here to become Americans.  Could the process of obtaining citizenship be made a bit more 'user-friendly'?  Probably, but I have no problem with current citizenship requirements.  The last thing this country needs is the Balkanization that is currently going on de facto.

That should really help drive the unemployment rate down.  Who gets to decide what sort of work is 'temporarily needed'?  You?

No, Kyl stated a fact.  And you do not need to go to Fox to get the news. Try the NY Times. How about the Federal government?

Just because it is EASIER to find the NEWS on fox does not make them the only source.

How, exactly?  Other than requiring them to verify legal status.

The health care bill has some nasty provisions in it because they knew it was going to cost a fortune.  basically, you are now required by law to create a 1099 for the boy who mows your lawn - because the democrats fear there is money that they are not taxing.  This provision is hitting businesses like farms very hard since it creates a mountain of paperwork that now has to be filled out. 

But the stupidity of the law (it is a liberal one, so of course it is stupid) is that they have over extended their hand.  Making it so onerous, they are going to find far fewer actually conforming to it.  It is like I try to tell the security folks who insist that "passwords be changed every 30 days and the last 40 cannot be re-used".  By making the rules so strict, they are actually making security less effective.  People cannot remember that many nor remember the changes that often (how long does it take you to stop writing the last year on a check after Jan 1?).

The smart farmers are going to start paying $250 for a bag of $25 fertilizer, just to have it "delivered".  Instead of getting more money, as always when tax rates go up, they are going to get less.