Why John McCain is best suited for Presidency

Politics. How boring.

By erathoniel Posted April 21, 2008 21:03:47

John McCain would make the best president for three reasons. He will get respect from foreign nations, he has all the necessary experience, and he will lead the nation through the turbulent times we face.

First, John McCain would make the best president because he will get respect from foreign nations. Our opponents are known to have racist and sexist members, and therefore having a female or African American president, while an important civil rights goal, is not best suited for our nation right now. Second, John McCain would make the best choices for America because he has the necessary experience. An ex-POW and an experienced politician, John McCain knows war and peace greater than any of the other candidates. Third, John McCain is the best presidential candidate because he will lead the nation through the dangerous times ahead safely. He knows what to do in an emergency due to his experience, and he is acceptable by all foreign nations.

John McCain is America's best Presidential Candidate because he can lead the nation through the dangers ahead, he is experienced, and will recieve respect from our opponents and allies alike.

+5 Karma 75 Replies 5 Referrals

A conservative Christian backing a Republican candidate? I'm amazed.

~Zoo

Hey, I'd write for Huckabee, but he's not really up there anymore. He'd be a better candidate.

I'm surprised you didn't have an actual argument.

Can you elaborate?

What experience does John McCain have that is relevant to the Presidency? What is his foreign policy/diplomatic experience?

What proof can you offer that he is accepted and respected by foreign leaders?

What plans/stances of his do you feel make him the right choice to lead our nation?

As to the form of your article - your tenth-grade history teacher would have given you props for the

Thesis

Body paragraph(s)

Conclusion

setup, but from eleventh-grade on, they actually prefer if you put a little effort in.

As to the content - my article will be up later today. I'll post a link.

Love it Ted!

And here I thought this was going to be on his Pin Stripe suit.

I giveth, and I taketh away.

My answers to your article are found at that link.

Hey, I'm just writing here. People like my work more when it's in a form, not just random.

I'd like to draw your attention to the following argument, which proves beyond doubt that both John McCain and Sancho are inferior to one Cactoblasta.

I'd like to draw your attention to my other opponent (and probable choice for running mate, since I am the far-and-away favorite for the nomination):

Allosaurus for President!

Erathoniel, what "people" like it better? Who?

So far you've gotten nothing but grief here, so who is sending you praise for your "form"?

There is no substance to your articles, and to me that far overrides any "form". Beyond that, I agree with SC. I am beginning to wonder if you are fresh out of high school due to your insistence on using 5th grade opening (introduce idea), body (flesh out idea...you fail miserably here), and summarize idea format.

SanCho, did you read Irregular Webcomic before my review of it?

The form makes it easier to organize your ideas. At least everyone knows what I'm saying.

Not always. I have to work to understand what you're saying most of the time. I'm not hating on your style. I have a really tough time getting my points across many times. But I don't defend myself as if I'm crystal clear and everyone else is mistaken somehow. Maybe you should consider that if a lot of people say your stuff is crap that maybe it is.

I don't honestly give a d***. You can say whatever you want about what I write.

Woot! I made the McCain video ads play!

Yes, McCain is respected far and wide across the world, because everyone knows the world supports Iraq. When I am chooseing a president, I require a man or woman who does not talk down to me, who does not offer a continueation of the same failed policies. And yes, these policies are failed, as Basra clearly shows. Iran, the country we all happily bash and attack as responsible for the violence in Iraq, was responsible to negotiating the peaceful resolution of that battle. The surge that we were all told was temporary has become permanet, and Bush is handing of the whole mess to our next set of leaders. The economy is in ruins and America is laughed at at home and abroad, and what does McCain offer? More of the same.

oh, and to my fellow Demacrats, don't use personal insults, it merely weakens or invalidates your argument.

No offense, but I've heard people wanna vote for Dubya in the upcoming elections. And they're not those I'd think to be ultra-conservative.

oh, and to my fellow Demacrats, don't use personal insults, it merely weakens or invalidates your argument.

Good post. And great advice. But the bad news this year is we only have 3 (soon to be 2) candidates to choose from, and none of them pass the smell test.

Demacrats?

I love when republicans talk of "experience". Yes John McCain has all the experience he needs to effectively run this country even deeper into the dirt.

He has experience and knowledge when it concerns the economy. = None

He has experience in making logical and true decisions to better our future = Voted for the Iraq war, predicted the war will end in weeks and no long time occupation will be necessary.

He shows equal rights and privileges to all= against gay marriage.

Frankly all this man is running on is his supposedly conservatism philosophy and past war time experience, one is irrelevant and the other is not needed at the moment.

He has all the experience. But what is experience worth in politics when you gained it by making all the wrong choices?

He shows equal rights and privileges to all= against gay marriage.

YOu were going until you got there. That is a red herring created by bigots to try to project their hate and animosity onto those they do not like. The first part of your statement has nothing to do with the second part. You should think clearer.

t I've heard people wanna vote for Dubya in the upcoming elections.

Anyone dumb enough to have voted for GW even once deserves to be branded with an M for "MORON" anyone dumb enough to have voted for him twice deserves to be tried and convicted of treason. Anyone still dumb enough to have the right to vote permanently stripped from them and any children unfortunate enough to be their kids.

Right...How DARE we allow people to vote their conscience, The_Politico!

And I am saying this as a person that would rather dive into a swimming pool filled with double edged razor blades (with apologies to Weird Al), then follow that with a soak bath in lemon juice than vote for Dubya even once. But I still believe that we as citizens should have a right to that vote rather than have bullies like you try to shame us away from it!

The_Politico, you could consider the USSR. They don't vote there.

Dr Guy

He shows equal rights and privileges to all= against gay marriage.YOu were going until you got there. That is a red herring created by bigots to try to project their hate and animosity onto those they do not like. The first part of your statement has nothing to do with the second part. You should think clearer.

He allows straight couples to get married but not gays. Yea that's an absence of privileges to a group of United States citizens due to bigotry and a self imposed moral rule not shared by all.

They are both relevant.

You should think clearer as well.